As
a Graduate Student Associate, I have been privileged to learn how
colleagues teach in a variety of disciplines throughout the University.
In conducting Teaching
Analysis Polls for many colleagues, I have found deep affinities
across disciplines in terms of what makes for effective teaching-and,
fortunately, that many of us at the University actually do these
things. Not surprisingly, many of us also face similar difficulties
in the eyes of our pupils, and I share here both our successes and
students' ongoing concerns in order to prompt further reflection
within the teaching community. This indicates just how much we can
learn from student evaluation and classroom assessment, and how
much students know about what makes teaching effective.
In
response to the question "What helps you to learn?", students
replied, "Practical examples" in a resounding chorus. When I pressed
them as to why examples were helpful, students gave a variety
of thoughtful answers: they see the principles under discussion
in action, examples give them the opportunity to apply the material,
and they provide a tangible vocabulary from which students can
proceed to more abstract principles. Practical examples are not
a substitute for theory, but rather a way students can initially
engage with and appropriate complex conceptual material.
Secondly, a majority of students find small group work helpful
for their learning. Small groups provide alternative avenues of
participation and make possible different types of classroom discussion.
When students move from small to large groups, they may present
results or ask questions of other students, thereby opening a
variety of large group discussion formats. While small groups
need not be used at all times, students recognize their value
in increasing the quality and variety of discussion sections as
a whole.
Two
impediments to learning surface across disciplines in Teaching
Analysis Polls. First, organization and presentation of materials
are often the greatest impediments to learning. Students new to
a discipline often have little idea how to ask questions, or which
ideas are truly important. They often suggest outlining the goals
and expectations of assignments and giving questions to guide
their reading to help overcome these difficulties. This issue
is often a challenge precisely because we are so immersed in our
specialties that connections and issues stand out for us in ways
that are not apparent to our students.
A second
issue is the difficulty and relevance of secondary, "critical"
essays. Students often find these to be boring, confusing, or
irrelevant. Suffice it to say that their most common solution
to this problem-"Get rid of the articles!"-is unsatisfactory from
an instructor's perspective. Teaching students critical reading
skills and the work constitutive of normal academic inquiry are
both valuable pedagogical goals that inform these tasks. We as
an academic community need to think about how we can effectively
convey the import and significance of these materials to our students
in ways that will help them to see the value of detailed work
within a particular academic discipline.