Reflections
on Teaching: The Science of Showing Off
Wade
Edwards, TA, Department of French
In the French
Department, new TAs traditionally take an introductory course on foreign
language pedagogy in which we discuss the vicissitudes of teaching, discern
some strategies for dealing with weekly crises, and worry about what to
wear. As part of our final project, we compile a teaching portfolio: a
collection of critiqued lessons and exercises and quizzes, as well as
some thoughts about our own teaching style. The goal of the course and
the portfolio is to have us think seriously, at the start of our careers,
about how we teach. Do we tailor our methods to match our students' particular
moods? Can we devise snappy composition topics that will make a student
happy to write? Can we convey to our students that learning French is
about more than ordering baguettes and brie and asking for directions
from the bookstore to the train station?
A less emphasized
aspect of the course, but one equally as important, is the directive to
think about why we teach. Indeed, it is a challenge well worth some honest
reflection. Now in my fourth year as a instructor of beginning and intermediate
French, I've come to realize that I teach for selfish reasons. I teach
for the intoxicating high that inevitably follows a well- paced, well-organized
language class. I teach for that moment of epiphany when, at semester's
end, my students ask how they can get into my next class. I teach for
a glowing (yet earnest) course evaluation. I teach to convert those students
who think they hate required courses. And I teach, I suppose, to show
off.
Such self-consciousness
does require, however, a hefty dose of resourcefulness. Left on my own,
I would soon wear a hole in my bag of pedagogical tricks. I've learned
in my four years that the best teacher's aide is the gossip in the departmental
lounge; over a cup of bad coffee, my colleagues often drop precious classroom
hints while they swap war stories. Bit by bit, I've learned to borrow
Susie's strategy for assigning essays, Paul's approach to pronunciation,
Karen's cultural overheads, all of them useful roadmaps to carry along
on my admitted ego trip. Teaching, it seems to me, is always a group effort,
even if the glory one seeks is solitary. One would be negligent not to
profit from the style and creativity of one's colleagues. In fact, I profit
most when I sit in on other French classes or substitute for other instructors.
Little do they know how often I pilfer their lesson plans.
Because my
students each learn differently and because each has a different degree
of interest in my subject, I try to incorporate in my classes various
ways of learning. I play Jeopardy; I show music videos; I lead my students
to the letterbox where they recite and mail the postcards they've written.
But I also love the structure and discipline of mechanical drills, perhaps
because I couldn't have learned my subject without the charts, graphs,
and momentary fear that such exercises demand. Word games and role plays
have become for me effective teaching tools, as have tension and dread.
The trick, then, is to steal ideas from colleagues with varying temperaments
and a wide range of teaching styles. If I've learned anything as a teacher,
it's that the science of showing off demands little selectivity. Every
colleague is my personal orchard, ripe and awaiting harvest.
The nature
of my discipline requires that I teach students how to form a coherent
thought in a foreign language. I have a professional responsibility to
monitor their choice of words, their accent, the way they conjugate verbs.
In a larger sense, however, teaching a language is about allowing people
to question their experiences, to wonder about things they take for granted,
to think about the mechanics of words and how they limit and liberate
our perception of the world. Though I have no delusions of grandeur, I
do understand that helping people acquire a new language is really about
helping them form new habits and new outlooks. It's about teaching them
how to pilfer accents and pet phrases and philosophies of life. And since
we live our life in language, we live better when we understand more than
one.
Why I teach,
then, determines how I teach. Vainglory helps me find fresh ideas and
vanity keeps me from embarrassing myself. My students, who come to me
as trustworthy citizens governed by a code of honor, are, I hope, all
the better for it.
TRC NOTE: If
you're persuaded by Wade's reasoning, consider joining the TRC Mutual
Classroom Observations, described on the Announcements page, or setting
up departmental TA observations.

 
|