A
Method for Grading Essays in Any Course
Candace
Caraco, TA, Department of English
Grading
student papers for a course in any discipline presents a series of challenges
different from grading other kinds of assignments. Typically, a wide range
of responses will be acceptable, and every paper (unless it is plagiarized)
will have some merit. Consequently, grading essays demands a teacher's
close attention to insure that each paper is judged by the same standards.
A method for evaluating essays that breaks the grading process into parts
can help an instructor work more consistently and efficiently. By assessing
papers based upon the three general categories of ideas, argument, and
mechanics and style, categories easily adapted for each discipline and
assignment, an instructor can more easily recognize and comment on an
essay's strengths and weaknesses and so face that daunting pile of twenty,
forty, or even one hundred essays with less trepidation. Furthermore,
if teachers make clear to students how this method works, fewer students
will be confused about their grades or apt to charge that papers are graded
in an arbitrary or purely subjective way.
Before
applying the three categories for evaluation, think through what it is
you want an assignment to accomplish. Grades should reflect the most significant
strengths and weaknesses of an essay, so a teacher should carefully consider
ahead of time what expectations he or she has for a paper and especially
what he or she most wants students to do for a particular assignment.
For example,
- Do the
instructions to students require specific tasks, such as agreeing
or disagreeing with an author, outlining a book's argument for review,
or analyzing a particular section of a work?
- What
is it that students should show they understood?
More generally,
a teacher may also consider the following:
- Has the
student presented ideas in a logical order?
- Is the
essay written in clear, grammatically correct prose?
- Has the
student offered explanation or examples to support generalizations?
For
any given assignment, your criteria for success may vary in the details;
whatever they are, make a list of them. Ideally, students would receive
a copy of this list before they begin writing their essays.
The
problem with such a list of criteria, however, is that it can quickly
grow unwieldy. While we need some specific questions as a checklist for
student writing success, we can benefit from a streamlined evaluation
system. The ideas/argument/mechanics and style format is a simple way
to group criteria, both for yourself and your students. Once you have
a set of criteria for an essay to succeed, you can decide how these questions
fit under the three headings. A general breakdown of these questions might
look like this:
.
IDEAS
- Does
the student understand the accompanying reading or the principles
behind the experiment, etc.?
- Does
the student offer original interpretations?
- Do the
student's explanations of terms, ideas, and examples demonstrate an
ability to grasp the main points, paraphrase them, and apply them?
- Does
the student answer the question(s) assigned?
- Does
the essay demonstrate an understanding of a subject, or does it wander
from one subject to the next without offering more than superficial
remarks?
. ARGUMENT
- Can we
easily determine what the author's main point is?
- Does
the essay provide a series of points that add up to an argument supporting
the main point (thesis)?
- Does
the essay proceed logically from point to point?
- Does
the student provide examples and explanations to support his or her
generalizations?
- Does
the essay contain contradictions? Is the paragraph structure logical?
. MECHANICS
AND STYLE
- Is it
clear what the student's point of view is?
- Does
the student control tone? Is the essay free of grammatical errors?
- Is the
essay punctuated appropriately?
- Do citations
and bibliography follow the correct format?
- Is the
prose clear or do you puzzle over individual sentences?
- Are words
spelled correctly?
What I am suggesting
is essentially adapted from the methods of two English professors, Charlene
Sedgwick and Steve Cushman. Sedgwick's "ENWR Handbook" offers guidelines
for evaluating freshman composition papers by assessing focus, organization,
style, and mechanics; Cushman has in the past recommended that graders
for his upper-level literature courses weigh mechanics and style (together)
as one-third of a grade, and ideas and argument as the other two-thirds.
Though instructors for non-English courses may want less emphasis on writing
skills per se in an essay grade, I would argue that papers for
all courses should be evaluated at least in part for their grammar, punctuation,
and prose style because these fundamentals of writing are everywhere necessary
for readers to understand writers. And a teacher in any discipline can
easily tailor the three categories of ideas/argument/mechanics and style
to the conventions of the course and its academic discipline.
Simplified
(and Platonized) then, these three categories translate into the following
grade scale: essays with good ideas that are logically organized into
an argument and written in clear and mechanically clean prose receive
an A; essays lacking in one category (e.g., have poor organization) receive
a B; essays weak in two categories receive a C; and essays that manage
none the three general criteria garner a D or fail. What constitutes an
"A" within any given category will also depend upon the course level and
the assignment, but in a very general way, if a student's essay can answer
"yes" to all of your questions for a category, then the student should
have an "A" for that portion of the grade. (More explicit criteria appear
in "Responding to
Student Writing" by Stella Deen in the November, 1995, Teaching
Concerns.)
Particularly
for new teachers, it is sometimes helpful to read through several essays
to see what an average paper for a class looks like. Checking to see if
several papers have similar difficulties can also help you detect unclear
instructions in the assignment or a content issue that may require further
class discussion: if we have been unclear in some way, then we should
be prepared to cut our students some slack when evaluating that part of
the assignment.
However
much we simplify the process, grading essays will never be as simple as
marking multiple choice exams. Most student essays are some combination
of good ideas and slight misunderstanding, clear argument and less clear
argument: they don't neatly divide into three parts. Typically the problems
in an essay are closely related: for example, a misunderstanding of content
can lead to a logical flaw in the argument and to prose that is full of
short sentences because the author is not certain which ideas should be
subordinated to others. Because of this system of logical relations, it
is all the more important to include a final comment with a grade.
Writing
final comments may indeed slow grading, but the pedagogical benefits of
comments far outweigh the few minutes per paper needed to write them.
Students continue to learn from an assignment if they understand what
their work accomplished and what it didn't. More importantly, final comments
can help students write more fully conceived and better executed papers
on the next assignment. (For a time-saving method of offering detailed
comments about common problems in a set of essays, see Nancy Childress's
essay "Using General
Comment Sheets," published in the October, 1995 issue of Teaching
Concerns; she recommends preparing a handout for the entire class
in addition to [shorter] written comments on individual essays.)
One
way to organize an end comment is to write at least one sentence pertaining
to each of the three categories of ideas, argument, and style and mechanics.
Breaking an essay into these three components can help us comment on an
essay's strengths and weaknesses more quickly than if we had no set criteria
or if we had too many. A particularly successful comment will explain
to a student how ideas, argument, style, and even grammar work together.
Final comments also serve as a check on ourselves, especially if we tie
our general end comments to specific examples within the paper. For example,
when I finish reading Student A's essay, I may sense that he didn't offer
proof in support of assertions. But when I look for an example of an unsupported
assertion, I find there are passages that might serve as supporting evidence;
however, he has not explained very carefully how the examples work, so
my impression has been that his essay lacks proof. Even when we are sure
that we have avoided bias and inconsistency, comments pointing to examples
will better illustrate to students what they can improve. Above all, comments
should not be mere justifications for grades, though they may coincidentally
deter students from seeking explanations as to why the received a "B"
instead of an "A."
TRC
NOTE: For help in implementing these suggestions, request a Writing
Workshop.

 
|